Week 28 HACCP Hazard Analysis - We've Got SALSA Sussed
Week 28 HACCP Hazard Analysis
Hi Everyone!
I hope you had fun with your
HACCP Process Flow Diagrams last week!
This week, we are tackling the
Hazard Analysis part of HACCP. This is the tricky bit.
We will look at the Process
Steps, and assess the types of hazards which could occur at each step. The
hazard categories fall into the following:
1. Microbiological
2. Physical
3. Chemical
4. Allergenic
We will look at how to
document the hazards and we will look at how we are going to control them.
Control Measures come in many
forms, and are usually found within one of the Prerequisite Procedures.
If not, then they could be a CCP.
A CCP is a Critical Control Point. A point in the process which is critical to
ensuring the product becomes safe.
To complete the Hazard
Analysis section, we will have to look into the ‘Severity versus Likelihood’ to
determine the Significant Hazards. So buckle up people, it’s going to be a
detailed read!
If you get this bit right, you
will have the knowledge, understanding of HACCP and a logical, methodical HACCP
Study in place!
Step No Blog No
1. Assemble
the HACCP Team (Week
25)
2. Describe
the product (Week
26)
3. Identify
the intended use and users (Week
26)
4. Construct
a flow diagram (Week
27)
5. Validate
the flow diagram (Week
27)
6. Conduct a
hazard analysis and consider controls (Week
28)
7. Determine
Critical Control Points (CCPs)
8. Establish
critical limits for each CCP
9. Establish
monitoring procedures for each CCP
10.Establish
corrective actions
11.Establish
verification procedures
12.Establish
documentation and record keeping
What’s coming next…
Week 29 Critical Control Point Decisions
Hazard Analysis - what do you need to show your SALSA auditor?
Hazard Analysis
Severity v Likelihood
Determination
Controls & Prerequisites
The Hazard Analysis is the main
part of your HACCP, and essential to get this right. Knowing where to start is
tricky.
There’s a lot of information to
take in here, so get ready….!
I will explain in simple terms.
Firstly, have your Hazard Analysis
table set out ready for you to input the information….. My opinion is to keep
it all in one table, so you capture the whole story all at once, here is my
suggestion:
Process Step & Ref |
Hazards |
Risk
Rating |
Significant Hazard to Proceed? (Y/N) |
Prerequisite |
CCP
Decision Tree |
|||||||
Severity (H/M/L) |
Likelihood (H/M/L) |
Control
Measures |
Q1 |
Q2 |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q5 |
CCP Yes
/ No |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This week, we are concentrating on
the Hazard Analysis and Controls, therefore we will just take the first section
of the table, and go back to the CCP Decision Tree section next week.
Process Step & Ref |
Hazards |
Risk
Rating |
Significant Hazard to Proceed? (Y/N) |
Prerequisite |
CCP
Decision Tree |
|||||||
Severity (H/M/L) |
Likelihood (H/M/L) |
Control
Measures |
Q1 |
Q2 |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q5 |
CCP Yes
/ No |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To fill in the hazard analysis
table we need to follow these steps below:
Step 1
Add in all of your process steps
from your Process Flow. Do not miss any out, even if you think there are no
hazards associated with them. Work from your process flow diagram. Start with
the Goods In Process Steps.
Process Step & Ref |
|
Mains Water Infeed W1 |
|
Frozen Ingredient Intake A1 |
|
Frozen Storage A2 |
|
Chilled Ingredient Intake B1 |
|
Ambient Ingredient Intake B2 |
|
Packaging intake P1 |
|
Packaging Storage P2 |
Step 2
Document the hazards at each
process step. You may have more than one
hazard to think about as we have to consider all four:
1. Physical
hazards
2. Chemical
hazards
3. Allergenic
hazards
4. Microbiological
hazards
This is the tricky bit. You need
to show you have considered all relevant hazards, without going overboard, but
with enough detail.
You need to describe what the
actual hazard is, where it has come from, what affect it will have, and what it
is due to.
Start with, whether the hazard is Present
in the raw material, or Introduced. Is there Growth of a
Pathogen, or has it Survived? I remember this with my PIGS analogy.
Process Step & Ref |
Hazards |
|
Mains Water Infeed W1 |
Presence of Pathogen or Chemical
contamination of the finished product due to contaminated water |
|
Frozen Ingredient Intake A1 |
Growth of pathogens in the finished
product due to temperature abuse during transit. |
|
Presence of pathogenic, physical,
allergenic or chemical contamination due to damages throughout
transportation. |
||
Introduction of pathogens such as
Weill’s disease in the finished product due to pest contamination on the
delivery vehicle |
||
Frozen Storage A2 |
Growth of pathogens in the finished
product due to temperature abuse due to ineffective or malfunctioning
freezer. |
|
Introduction of pathogens or
allergens in storage due to incorrect storage and segregation practices. |
Step 4
Document the Control Measures you
already have in place to control the hazard, in the relevant column.
Add in the relevant column, the ‘Prerequisite
Procedure’ name that the ‘Control Measure’ is documented within.
If your Control Measure is in
place, but not documented in the relevant Prerequisite Procedure, then make
sure you add it.
Remember, all of the Prerequisite
Procedures we have chatted through from Week 1 to Week 24, are all defined by
the SALSA Standard. See the list from the SALSA Standard below:
It’s a good idea to have a list of
your Prerequisite Procedures in your HACCP Study Document, and list your Control
Measures next to each one for completeness. This is good practice and a good cross
check against what is in the procedure.
See the example of a few of the Prerequisites
and Controls below:
Prerequisite |
Controls |
Training
& Supervision |
Induction Training, specific task work
instruction training, CCP training and refresher training. Competency checks |
Personal
Hygiene |
Laundry washing, health screening, jewellery
policy, hand washing, personal items, protective clothing, blue plaster
issue. Illness reporting |
Cleaning |
Cleaning. Chemicals |
Contamination
& Cross Contamination Prevention |
Allergen contamination control, physical
contamination control, microbiological contamination control, chemical
contamination control. Raw and cooked segregation. Allergen storage
segregation, recipe scheduling. Metal control. Glass & Hard Plastic
control. Wood control. |
Process,
Environment & Equipment Control |
Temperature control, calibration. Average
weight, average quantity, minimum weight. |
Control
of Raw Materials |
Supplier approval, transportation during
delivery and transport hygiene. Goods in procedures. Storage of raw
materials, including food contact packaging, from wholesalers and direct
supplier delivery. Water from mains
water. Threats and vulnerabilities for raw material adulteration and
substitution |
Now let’s add our specific Control
Measures into the Hazard Analysis, in the correct column, and add the Prerequisite
Procedure they are included within. See the example below.
In your control measures, you can
add things that happen at a later step as well. Such as;
·
Cooking at a later step
·
Sterilisation at a later step
·
Metal detection at a later step
Process Step & Ref |
Hazards |
Risk
Rating |
Significant Hazard to Proceed? (Y/N) |
Pre-requisite
Topic |
||
Severity (H/M/L) |
Likelihood (H/M/L) |
Control
Measures |
||||
Mains Water Infeed W1 |
Presence of Pathogen or Chemical
contamination of the finished product due to contaminated water |
|
|
Annual Water Board Test Results Environmental Water Testing |
|
Control of Raw Materials |
Frozen Ingredient Intake A1 |
Growth of pathogens in the finished
product due to temperature abuse during transit. |
|
|
Temperature checks on arrival Goods in procedures Reputable suppliers used |
|
Control of Raw Materials |
Presence of pathogenic, physical,
allergenic or chemical contamination due to damages throughout
transportation. |
|
|
Packaging damages checks on arrival Rejection of damaged loads /
products Goods in procedures |
|
Control of Raw Materials |
|
Introduction of pathogens such as
Weill’s disease in the finished product due to pest contamination on the
delivery vehicle |
|
|
Vehicle checks on arrival for
cleanliness and signs of pests Goods in procedures Rejection of pest infested vehicles
/ signs of pests Reputable suppliers used |
|
Control of Raw Materials |
|
A2 |
Growth
of pathogens in the finished product due to temperature abuse due to
ineffective or malfunctioning freezer. |
|
|
Fridge
& Freezer temperature checks Fridge
and freezer maintenance Calibration |
|
Process,
Environment & Equipment Control Maintenance |
Introduction
of pathogens in storage due to incorrect storage and segregation practices. |
|
|
Raw
and cooked segregation in storage Covering
and sealing ingredients and products in storage Cooking
at a later step |
|
Contamination
& Cross Contamination Prevention |
|
Introduction
of allergens in storage due to incorrect storage and segregation practices. |
|
|
Allergen
segregation in storage Covering
and sealing ingredients and products in storage |
|
Contamination
& Cross Contamination Prevention |
Step 5
Next, we need to decide what the Severity
of the hazard is, and the Likelihood of it actually happening. Take into
consideration your Control Measures.
Severity of Hazards always stays
the same.
Likelihood of Hazards happening
varies. Why? Because it depends on the Control Measure which you have in place.
If you have really robust Controls and Prerequisite Procedures, the likelihood
of the hazard happening decreases.
When deciding on the hazard
Severity you need to decide if hazard is severe enough to cause….. death,
hospitalisation, illness, injury or none of them. I always use this to help me
decide upon both severity and likelihood.
Rating |
Severity (How serious would the consequences of the
hazard be?) |
Likelihood (What is the likelihood of the hazard
occurring and causing contamination?) |
High 3 |
Death Hospitalisation
and long-term serious illness |
It is likely as
it has happened previously in this business |
Medium 2 |
Short term hospitalisation Short term
injury Short term
illness |
It has happened
in the industry before. |
Low 1 |
Minor injury |
It has not
happened before or not happened for a very long time. |
Then, we have to decide if the
hazard is significant enough to take it through the CCP (Critical Control
Point) Decision Tree. Red is significant, and green is not. We will take some
significant hazards through the decision tree next week.
Severity |
H |
|
|
|
Key: |
||
M |
|
|
|
Significant hazard |
Yes |
||
L |
|
|
|
Not significant hazard |
No |
||
L |
M |
H |
|||||
Likelihood |
Some people prefer to use numbers
to score Severity and Likelihood, then calculate an overall score which decides
upon your significant hazards. This is acceptable, and some auditors prefer it.
However, I like to keep it as simple as possible!
When thinking about the hazard you
have identified, you need to think of the Severity of the hazard at the Process
Step you are at. Pathogenic contamination is serious for most pathogens. If
it is not controlled, the consequences could be fatal to vulnerable groups.
Therefore, severity is usually high. The same applies to allergens. We have all
read news articles, where there have been fatalities due to allergenic cross
contamination. So again, severity is high. Yes, we are going to control the
hazard, but the severity of it is still high! You need to think about worst
case scenario when deciding upon severity.
Next, think about how you are
controlling those hazards, and decide upon how likely they are to actually
happen. You need to consider if they have happened before, on your site, or in
the industry. This is where your initial research comes in useful, regarding
your product and your ingredients. Use the Severity v Likelihood table above to
help you decide. Do not put Low for everything, as this is
not realistic (I only say this, as I see it a lot on HACCP’s which I have
audited).
Process Step & Ref |
Hazards |
Risk
Rating |
Significant Hazard to Proceed? (Y/N) |
Pre-requisite
Topic |
||
Severity (H/M/L) |
Likelihood (H/M/L) |
Control
Measures |
||||
Mains Water Infeed W1 |
Presence of Pathogen or Chemical
contamination of the finished product due to contaminated water |
H |
L |
Annual Water Board Test Results Environmental Water Testing |
Yes |
Control of Raw Materials |
Frozen Ingredient Intake A1 |
Growth of pathogens in the finished
product due to temperature abuse during transit. |
H |
M |
Temperature checks on arrival Goods in procedures Reputable suppliers used |
Yes |
Control of Raw Materials |
Presence of pathogenic, physical,
allergenic or chemical contamination due to damages throughout
transportation. |
H |
M |
Packaging damages checks on arrival Rejection of damaged loads /
products Goods in procedures |
Yes |
Control of Raw Materials |
|
Introduction of pathogens such as
Weill’s disease in the finished product due to pest contamination on the
delivery vehicle |
H |
M |
Vehicle checks on arrival for
cleanliness and signs of pests Goods in procedures Rejection of pest infested vehicles
/ signs of pests Reputable suppliers used |
Yes |
Control of Raw Materials |
|
Frozen Storage A2 |
Growth of pathogens in the finished
product due to temperature abuse due to ineffective or malfunctioning
freezer. |
H |
M |
Fridge & Freezer temperature
checks Fridge and freezer maintenance |
Yes |
Process, Environment & Equipment
Control Maintenance |
Introduction of pathogens in storage
due to incorrect storage and segregation practices. |
H |
M |
Raw and cooked segregation in
storage Covering and sealing ingredients and
products in storage Cooking at a later step |
Yes |
Contamination & Cross
Contamination Prevention |
|
Introduction of allergens in storage
due to incorrect storage and segregation practices. |
H |
M |
Allergen segregation in storage Covering and sealing ingredients and
products in storage |
Yes |
Contamination & Cross
Contamination Prevention |
Below are some additional examples
of a hazards which are calculated as ‘Low Significance’, and also some examples
of hazards which do not have a specific Prerequisite Procedure…… This may be
because they are very specific processes and might also become a CCP. Next week
we will go into CCP’s, but I will let you absorb all of this before going any
further!
Process Step & Ref |
Hazards |
Risk
Rating |
Significant Hazard to Proceed? (Y/N) |
Pre-requisite
Topic |
||
Severity (H/M/L) |
Likelihood (H/M/L) |
Control
Measures |
||||
Mixing D3 |
Plastic in the finished product due
to the use of weighing tools such as scoops that are in poor condition. |
L |
L |
Control of tools and equipment. |
No |
Premises, Equipment &
Maintenance |
Cooking / Baking D4 |
Survival of pathogens such as Staphylococcus
aureus or Salmonella in the finished product, due to ineffective heat
treatment. |
H |
L |
Heat Treatment Baking & Cooking |
Yes |
NA |
Cooling D5 |
Growth of pathogens such as Bacillus
Cereus in the finished product due to the product not being cooled to the set
temperature within the required safe time limit. |
H |
L |
Effective cooling Blast Chilling |
Yes |
NA |
This week might have been
information overload! However, if you follow these steps to HACCP, you will
start to understand the logic and methodology behind HACCP. You will begin to
understand how everything fits together perfectly!
Christmas Tree is going up tonight
people! Bring on the Bailey’s and the mince pies. And it has just began snowing!
Cheers!
Be careful and stay safe!
Ruth
Ruthshawconsultingltd@gmail.com
07732
966 836
It is truly a practical blog to discover some various resource to include my knowledge. Pest Control Mississauga
ReplyDelete