Week 14 - Raw Material Risk Assessment, Substitution & Adulteration - We've Got SALSA Sussed
Week 14 - RAW MATERIAL RISK ASSESSMENT, SUBSTITUTION AND ADULTERATION
Hi Everyone!
Raw Material Risk Assessment, Substitution &
Adulteration
This section, I find, people struggle with. Or don’t know
quite where to start with it. I am going to show you how to tackle a simple
version of a Raw Material Risk Assessment for Adulteration & Substitution.
SALSA’s definitions of Adulteration & Substitution
are:
Adulteration - Reducing the quality of food by including
a foreign substance, in order to lower costs or fake a higher quality.
Substitution - Replacing a food or ingredient with
another substance that is similar but inferior.
The reason we have to carry out this risk assessment originates
from the horse meat scandal. When this incident happened in the food industry, you
might remember that it was highly publicised by the media. The food industry
responded to this by ensuring food safety standards such as BRC and SALSA
incorporated ways to tackle the issue. This was done by incorporating raw
material risk assessments for the threats and vulnerabilities of food being
adulterated or substituted.
Since the horsemeat scandal, it has become apparent that
there are lots of ingredients and products which are at risk from adulteration.
Therefore, we need to ensure we have researched all of the raw materials that
we are handling, to make sure we have got ours covered.
We will look at how to find information if the raw
materials have had a risk of adulteration and substitution associated with them
historically. We will look to see if they have any claims associated with them
which could make them vulnerable to adulteration and substitution. We will look
at the Countries of Origin risks and supply chains for the raw materials to see
how lengthy they are, and how many times the ingredient changes hands in
transit from the point of manufacture, prior to it arriving with you.
Let’s get started!
What’s coming next…
Supplier
& Raw Material Controls
Week 15 – WATER
TESTING
Raw Material Risk Assessment – what do you need to
show your SALSA auditor?
Supplier & Raw Material
Approval Procedure
Raw Material Risk Assessment
Supplier & Raw Material
Approval Procedure
In the SALSA Standard, there are
many elements to Section 1.6 Control of Raw Materials. In the last 2 blogs, we
have spoken about the Supplier & Raw Materials Approval Criteria and the
Goods Intake Procedure. This week, we need to add the Raw Material Risk
Assessment to the procedure. Of course, you can split the procedures out if you
wish. However,
I always keep the sections and referencing of procedures the same as the SALSA
standard. This keeps it simple to follow.
Raw Materials Risk Assessment Procedure
For the Raw Material Risk Assessment
Procedure, you need to detail how you carry out the risk assessment.
Base the procedure on:
1.
How you research – the information sources you
use
2.
What you base the criteria on for the research
- historical information, claims, supply chain and country of origin.
3.
Where you record the information - the Raw Material
Risk Assessment
4.
What you do about controlling the risks -
documenting the risks, the control measures and evidence that the control
measures have been carried out.
Research
There are some preparation stages in
the raw material risk assessment. Some research is required for the categories
of products and ingredients you use.
You can ask your suppliers for
information, using your supplier questionnaire, when gathering information
initially. However, always carry out research of your own to support this.
Claims & History of Adulteration
& Substitution
The first things to research are Claims
and History of adulteration and substitution.
When considering claims, you need to
think about the claims which come from the raw materials and which you are
stating on your Finished Product pack. If you do not make a claim on the Finished
Product pack, then the raw material is not putting your product at risk.
1.
Is there a CLAIM on the raw material, which
you state on the finished product packaging? Such as:
a. Free range
eggs
b. Organic
c. Provenance
claims
d. Made from
UK strawberries
e. Vegan
f.
There are many more claims you may use, but
for the purposes of the raw material risk assessment, the claims must come from
the raw materials.
When researching historical risks
associated with your raw materials, there are many portals you can look up.
However, I have listed the ones I use the most below. These are the ones I find
most useful.
2.
Is there a HISTORY of adulteration or
substitution of any of the raw materials? You can research on the following,
however there are food fraud portals which you can pay for as well if you wish.
a. RASFF (Rapid
Alert System for Food and Feed)
https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/rasff-window/portal/?event=searchForm#
b. FSA (Food
Standards Agency) food alerts
https://www.food.gov.uk/news-alerts
c. European
Commission Food Fraud Summary. This one has to be my favourite. It provides
monthly updates; all of the information is very up to date and relevant.
https://ec.europa.eu/knowledge4policy/food-fraud-quality/food-fraud-summary-june-2020_en
If the ingredient does not have either
of these risks, then you do not have to consider the supply chain or country of
origin, as you have established there are no risk of it being adulterated or
substituted.
You can also ask for information from
your supplier as previously mentioned, but it is important to do your own
research, and to continue to keep receiving alerts. This will ensure you always
have the knowledge of what is happening in the industry.
I use this simple scoring system to
add to my Raw Material Risk Assessment
Threats
& Vulnerabilities of
Substitution & Adulteration |
|
Has the raw material supplied have any
history of adulteration or substitution? Y / N |
Y =
a score of 2 N =
a score of 0 |
Does the raw material have a claim such as
organic, free from, or provenance claim? Y / N |
Y =
a score of 2 N =
a score of 0 |
Supply Chain & Country of Origin
If the ingredients do have
claims and/or history of adulteration or substitution, then you
need to look at your supply chain and country of origin to ascertain whether
the place you are getting ingredients from is a high risk country. Also, is
there an opportunity in the supply chain for the ingredients to be substituted
or adulterated.
1.
What is the COUNTRY OF ORIGIN?
Where the ingredient is manufactured in a high-risk country, there
is more risk. There is a Food Security Index, ranking all countries, which is
very useful to use. https://foodsecurityindex.eiu.com/Index
Or
alternatively, I use the simple scoring system below. I add to the previous
scores for claims and historical risks on my Raw Material Risk Assessment.
2.
How long is the SUPPLY CHAIN?
A long and
complicated supply chain, where the ingredient changes hands many times,
provides an opportunity for the ingredients to be adulterated or substituted.
It is advisable, to look how many steps from the point of manufacture, to when
it arrives at your door, to check if there are any risk points such as
repacking. You can ask your supplier for all of this information. Again, I add
the score on for further supply chain risks and calculate the overall score for
all of the risks I have found. You will see my completed example further on.
Threats
& Vulnerabilities of
Substitution & Adulteration |
||
Detail the manufacturing site country: |
UK = a
score of 0 |
Europe=
a score of 1 |
USA/Canada, Singapore, Australia, New
Zealand = a score of 2 |
Other International = a score of 3 |
|
How many steps are in the supply chain back
to the place of manufacture? (Please include intermediate agents,
wholesalers, storage and distribution steps in the no of steps back) |
1 step = a score of 0 |
2-3 steps = a score of 1 |
4-5 steps = a score of 2 |
Over 5 steps = a score of 3 |
Raw Materials Risk Assessment
When we have carried out research on the
raw materials, we need to record it. We also need to define what we believe is
a high-risk raw material to our business. Therefore, adding overall scoring to
determine this, based upon results, is a great idea.
For the example I am using, the score
categories I have used are:
High Risk = a score of 4 - 10
Medium Risk = a score of 2 - 3
Low Risk = a score of 0 - 1
The risk to your business may differ.
You can adjust the scores based on the what you believe the risks to your
business are.
Below, I have put together a simple
Raw Material Risk Assessment table to capture the information and have scored
it accordingly.
If you find there are no risks, ensure
you still add the raw materials to the risk assessment, to show they have also
been considered, and you have not missed them.
Ingredient Category |
Risk |
Adulteration
& Substitution Score |
Control Measure |
|||
Claims |
History |
Supply
Chain |
Country of
Origin |
|||
Spices - Cumin |
NA |
Adulteration
with nuts / nut shells |
1. Grown
& Ground in India 2.
Transported to Turkey 3. Packed
in Turkey 4.
Transported to UK |
India |
7 |
1. Certificate
of Analysis from supplier 2. Traceability
Test once per year 3. Request
suppliers risk assessment and controls for the raw material |
Meat - Beef |
UK Reared Red
Tractor Certified |
Horsemeat
found used as beef |
1. UK
Farms 2. UK
Slaughter 3. UK
Cutting Plant 4.
Transported to site |
UK |
5 |
1. Speciation
Testing sent from supplier 2. Traceability
Test once per year, back to farm – completed by the supplier 3. Red Tractor
Certificate provided annually |
Organic Strawberries |
Organic |
Non
organic strawberries |
1. UK
Farm 2.
Transported to site |
UK |
4 |
1. Organic
Certificate provided annually 2. Product
inspection for organic product delivered and paperwork confirmation of
organic |
Veg Oils |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Flour |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Control Measures
Once you have added all of the detail to your
Risk Assessment, and calculated your overall scoring, you will have determined
your high-risk raw materials.
It is important to add the control measures
for all risks you find, those which are medium and low risks too, however the
control measures may not be as specific, such as testing.
When we are considering the control measures
to apply to the risk, we need to provide evidence that the risk has been
eliminated, or prevented. This is the documented detail which will protect the
business and the consumer.
Certificates of Analysis provide information
on testing which has been carried out on the raw material to prove that it is
free from the risk.
Speciation testing is to prove meat is what it
says it is.
Organic certification is to prove the supplier
has been through the organic audit, you need to make sure the raw material they
supply you is included within the scope of the audit on the certificate.
Traceability Tests provide the information
that the ingredient has come from the farm, or manufacturer, packing facility,
storage or transport companies that it is supposed to. And that all parties
involved are certified to the correct food safety standards.
There are many controls. Remember that, if
your suppliers are covered by a food safety standard such as BRC or SALSA, they
will have had to complete an assessment just like this, so should be very
knowledgeable about their raw materials and controls they have put in place.
It is a complicated one, but if you follow the
simple steps above, then you’ve got this!
Have a good week!
If you need assistance, please
feel free to contact me! On that note, that is the end of this section. Please
do not hesitate to ask any questions.
Be careful and stay safe!
Ruth
Ruthshawconsultingltd@gmail.com
07732
966 836
Comments
Post a Comment